Title of article
Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia
Author/Authors
Casas، نويسنده , , S??lvia and Avent??n، نويسنده , , Anna and Fuentes، نويسنده , , Francisca and Vallesp??، نويسنده , , Teresa and Granada، نويسنده , , Isabel and Carri?، نويسنده , , Anna and Angel Mart??nez-Climent، نويسنده , , Jose and Solé، نويسنده , , Francesc and Teixid?، نويسنده , , Montserrat and Bernués، نويسنده , , Marta and Duarte، نويسنده , , José and Maria Hern?ndez، نويسنده , , Jes?s، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
16
To page
25
Abstract
A total of 127 adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) patients were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) at diagnosis. Conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) showed a normal karyotype in 45 cases and an abnormal karyotype in 56 cases; in the remaining cases, CCA either failed to yield sufficient metaphase cells (19/26) or was not done (7/26). Abnormal CGH profiles were identified in 39 patients (30.7%). DNA copy number losses (61%) were high compared to gains (39%), whereas partial chromosome changes (76%) were more common than whole chromosomes changes (24%). Recurrent losses were detected on chromosomes 7, 5q (comprising bands 5q15 to 5q33), 7q (7q32∼q36), 16q (16q13∼q21), and 17p, and gains were detected on chromosomes 8, 22, and 3q (comprising bands 3q26.1∼q27). Furthermore, distinct amplifications were identified in chromosome regions 21q, 13q12∼q13, and 13q21.1. No cryptic recurrent chromosomal imbalances were identified by CGH in cases with normal karyotypes. The concordance between CGH results and CCA was 72.5%. In the remaining cases, CGH gave additional information compared to CCA (20%) and partially failed to identify the alterations previously detected by CCA (7.5%). The majority of discrepancies arose from the limitations of the CGH technique, such as insensitivity to detect unbalanced chromosomal changes when occurring in a low proportion of cells. CGH increased the detection of unbalanced chromosomal alterations and allowed precise defining of partial or uncharacterized cytogenetical abnormalities. Application of the CGH technique is thus a useful complementary diagnostic tool for CCA in de novo AML cases with abnormal karyotypes or with unsuccessful cytogenetics.
Journal title
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Record number
1826113
Link To Document