Superior diagnostic strength of combined contrast enhanced MR-angiography and MR-imaging compared to intra-arterial DSA in liver transplantation candidates

To evaluate the diagnostic value of combined contrast enhanced MRA (ce-MRA) and MRI compared to that of intra-arterial DSA (i.a.DSA) in liver transplantation, transjugular porto-systemic (TIPSS) and spleno-renal shunt candidates. ients in the workup for liver transplantation underwent ce-MRA/MRI and i.a.DSA within a three days interval. Both examinations were assessed with respect to vessel anatomy and patency of the arterial, portal venous, porto-systemic collateral and systemic venous system. The results were compared with the intra-operative findings when available. Malignancy detection in ce-MRA/MRI and i.a.DSA were compared. are no significant differences for the arterial part of the vascular supply to the liver that is important for transplantation. Although the differences for the portal system are not significant, the difference between the two techniques is of clinical importance because i.a.DSA failed to detect portal vein occlusion in 4 patients. Ce-MRA is significantly better for the detection of collaterals (p < 0.001) and the assessment of the inferior vena cava, the hepatic and the renal veins (p < 0.001). Although the detection of liver malignancy is poor in both techniques, ce-MRA/MRI is superior to i.a.DSA. tudy shows that a one step diagnostic approach with a combination of ce-MRA and MRI is a valuable radiological tool with a superior diagnostic strength compared to i.a.DSA in the liver transplantation and shunt candidate. Therefore, ce-MRA/MRI should replace i.a.DSA in these patients groups.