• Title of article

    Renal perfusion in acute kidney injury with DCE-MRI: Deconvolution analysis versus two-compartment filtration model

  • Author/Authors

    Zِllner، نويسنده , , Frank G. and Zimmer، نويسنده , , Fabian and Klotz، نويسنده , , Sarah and Hoeger، نويسنده , , Simone and Schad، نويسنده , , Lothar R.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    781
  • To page
    785
  • Abstract
    AbstractPurpose estigate the results of different pharmacokinetic models of a quantitative analysis of renal blood flow (RBF) in acute kidney injury using deconvolution analysis and a two-compartment renal filtration model. als and methods ta of ten male Lewis rats were analyzed retrospectively. Six animals were subjected to unilateral acute kidney injury and underwent perfusion imaging by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Renal blood flow was estimated from regions-of-interest depicting the cortex in the DCE-MRI perfusion maps. The perfusion models were compared by a paired t-test and Bland–Altman plots. s nificant difference was found between the two compartment model and the deconvolution analysis (P = 0.2807). Differences between healthy and diseased kidney in the AKI model were significant for both methods (P < 0.05). A Bland–Altman plot showed no systematic errors, and values were equally distributed around the mean difference between the methods lying within the range of 1.96 standard deviations. sion uantification strategies could detect the kidneys that were impaired by AKI. When just aiming at RBF as a marker, a deconvolution analysis can provide similar values as the 2CFM. If functional parameters beyond RBF like glomerular filtration rate are needed, the 2CFM should be employed.
  • Keywords
    DCE-MRI , Quantification , acute kidney injury , Renal Blood Flow , comparison
  • Journal title
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Serial Year
    2014
  • Journal title
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Record number

    1834338