Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging at different magnetic field strengths: What is feasible?

AbstractBackground limited SNR the cerebral applications of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) concept have been sparse. MRI hardware developments have resulted in improved SNR and this may justify a reassessment of IVIM imaging for non-invasive quantification of the cerebral blood volume (CBV) as a first step toward determining the optimal field strength. e estigate intravoxel incoherent motion imaging for its potential to assess cerebral blood volume (CBV) at three different MRI field strengths. als and methods olunteers were scanned twice at 1.5 T, 3 T as well as 7 T. By correcting for field-strength-dependent effects of relaxation, estimates of corrected CBV (cCBV) were obtained in deep gray matter (DGM), frontal gray matter (FGM) and frontal white matter (FWM), using Bayesian analysis. In addition, simulations were performed to facilitate the interpretation of experimental data. s , FGM and FWM we obtained cCBV estimates of 2.2 ml/100 ml, 2.7 ml/100 ml, 1.4 ml/100 ml at 1.5 T; 3.7 ml/100 ml, 5.0 ml/100 ml, 3.2 ml/100 ml at 3 T and 15.5 ml/100 ml, 20.3 ml/100 ml, 7.0 ml/100 ml at 7 T. sion tative cCBV values obtained at 1.5 T and 3 T corresponded better to physiological reference values, while 7 T showed the largest deviation from expected values. Simulations of synthetic tissue voxels indicated that the discrepancy at 7 T can partly be explained by SNR issues. Results were generally more repeatable at 7 T (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.84) than at 1.5 T (ICC = 0.68) and 3 T (ICC = 0.46).