Title of article :
Pulmonary valve-in-valve implants: how long do they prolong reintervention and what causes them to fail?
Author/Authors :
Law، نويسنده , , Kelsey B. and Phillips، نويسنده , , Katharine R.B. and Butany، نويسنده , , Jagdish، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
3
From page :
519
To page :
521
Abstract :
Background lve-in-valve (VinV) procedure is a minimally invasive, transcatheter, off-pump, alternative to conventional valve replacement, which uses a failing bioprosthesis to anchor a second transcatheter-delivered prosthesis. This technique appears effective for prolonging freedom from reintervention and treating early device failure. However, it is unknown as to how long reintervention can be avoided. s sent the pathological findings of a VinV explanted after 47 months, as well as the failure modes of these devices. s nV approach in our case ultimately failed, likely due to the proximity of the hostʹs tissues to the prosthetic device, resulting in a combination of pannus, calcification, and a cusp tear. sions onal long-term follow-up of pulmonary VinV implantations is needed in order to determine the life span of VinVs and what causes them to fail.
Keywords :
Cusp prolapse , calcification , Bioprosthesis failure , Hancock , melody , Cusp tear
Journal title :
Cardiovascular Pathology
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Cardiovascular Pathology
Record number :
1846080
Link To Document :
بازگشت