Plasmodium yoelii in mice: differential induction of cytokine gene expression during hyporesponsiveness induction and restimulation

Acute Plasmodium yoelii murine malaria is associated with a marked depression of splenic T cell responses. The present study was undertaken to address the question if a defect in T cell proliferation results from a relative increase of a non-T cell population in the spleen or real biological changes occurring in T cells of the spleen after infection. When animals were acutely infected, the splenic cells responded poorly to cross-linked anti-CD3 mAb, Con A, and PWM stimulation. At this stage, a very limited array of cytokine was expressed. We failed to detect the transcripts for IL-2R p55, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ in mice with acute P. yoelii malaria irrespective of the number of splenocytes subjected to RT-PCR. In contrast, late in the infection when mice cleared the parasites and became resistant to reinfection, mRNAs for the above cytokines as well as for IL-4, IL-5, GM-CSF, and TNF-α were detectable. During this late phase of infection, lymphocytes proliferated vigorously in response to TCR- and T cell mitogen-mediated stimulation. Surprisingly, during an early phase (as early as 3 days postinfection) with low parasitemia, before the establishment of T cell unresponsiveness, a broad array of cytokine expression including IL-2 and IFN-γ expression as well as marked lymphoproliferative response upon T cell mitogen- and TCR-mediated stimulation was observed. When the expression of cytokine gene in freshly isolated (ex vivo) splenocytes from P. yoelii-infected animals was investigated, a similar pattern of cytokine profile was detected. We devised a methodology in which RNA from an increasing number of splenocytes (ranging from 1 to 16 million) was used to compensate for any difference in the frequency of splenic T cells between immune and acutely infected mice and to augment target molecules which could be measured simultaneously by PCR. The data presented in this study led us to speculate that “anergy” or relative increase of a non-T cell population cannot account solely for the T cell unresponsiveness in the acute phase of infection. We suggest that inactivation or/and ablation of reactive T cells may explain T cell hyporesponsiveness during acute malaria.