• Title of article

    Management of cardiac arrest caused by coronary artery spasm: Epinephrine/adrenaline versus nitrates

  • Author/Authors

    Kiss، نويسنده , , Gabor and Corre، نويسنده , , Olivier and Gueret، نويسنده , , Gildas and Nguyen Ba، نويسنده , , Vinh and Gilard، نويسنده , , Martine and Boschat، نويسنده , , Jaques and Arvieux، نويسنده , , Charles Chistian، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    228
  • To page
    232
  • Abstract
    Background pulmonary resuscitation guidelines imply the use of epinephrine/adrenaline during cardiopulmonary arrest. However, in cardiac arrest situations resulting from coronary artery spasm (CAS), the use of epinephrine/adrenaline could be deleterious. s and Results ear-old patient underwent an emergency coronarography with an attempt to stent the coronary arteries. Radiologic imaging revealed a positive methylergonovine maleate (Methergine, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) test, with subocclusive CAS in several coronary vessels leading to electromechanical dissociation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, and intracoronary boluses of isosorbide dinitrate were given to treat CAS. Epinephrine/adrenaline was not administered during resuscitation. Spontaneous circulation was obtained after cardioversion for ventricular fibrillation, and the patient progressively regained consciousness. sion itation guidelines do not specify the use of trinitrate derivatives in cardiac arrest situations caused by CAS. The pros and cons of the use of nitrates and epinephrine/adrenaline during cardiac arrest caused by CAS are analyzed in this case report.
  • Journal title
    Heart and Lung
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    Heart and Lung
  • Record number

    1859032