Total elbow replacement with the GSB III prosthesis

Fourteen consecutive elbows have been treated for rheumatoid arthritis (9 elbows) and for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis (5 elbows) by total elbow replacement with the GSB III implant. The elbows were reviewed retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 6 years (2 to 9 years). Ten of 14 elbows had a functioning GSB III implant at follow-up; 7 of them were rated satisfactory and 3 unsatisfactory with the Mayo elbow performance score. In 5 of these 10 cases, the patients had significant pain relief with no or only mild pain at follow-up, whereas 5 had moderate to severe pain. With a functioning implant the range of motion averaged 140° of flexion, 19° of lack of extension, 65° of pronation, and 84° of supination. Six (43%) elbows had major complications requiring 1 to 8 additional operations. Aseptic loosening requiring revision occurred in 4 (29%) elbows. Two of them were treated by a resection arthroplasty, and 2 were revised with another hinged semiconstrained device. Three further elbows had radiolucent lines involving more than 50% of the cement-bone interface of either the humeral or the ulnar component. However, in 8 elbows the cementing technique was considered marginal or inadequate. Poor cementing (marginal or inadequate) was associated with loosening (P =.008). The GSB III total elbow prosthesis can restore function and reduce pain. The rate of aseptic loosening in this series was higher than previously reported. Based on this observation, we conclude that the GSB III implant seems to be sensitive to the insertion technique and does not tolerate suboptimal cementing. (J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:135-9.)