• Title of article

    The advantage of using in-situ methods for studying hydrogen mass transport: Neutron radiography vs. carrier gas hot extraction

  • Author/Authors

    Griesche، نويسنده , , Axel and Solَrzano، نويسنده , , Eusebio and Beyer، نويسنده , , Katrin and Kannengiesser، نويسنده , , Thomas، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    14725
  • To page
    14729
  • Abstract
    Neutron radiography (NR) is compared with the commonly used carrier gas hot extraction (CGHE) technique. We performed isothermal hydrogen effusion experiments at 623 K to study the mass transport kinetics. The investigated material was technical iron. The quantification of the hydrogen mass flow is done for NR by using concentration standards. The temporal hydrogen concentration evolution in the sample coincides well for both methods, i.e. NR and CGHE, and is in good agreement with literature. The advantages of the NR method are the non-destructive nature of measuring and the in-situ determination of hydrogen concentrations with high spatial and temporal resolution. Remaining hydrogen inside the sample can be identified directly by the NR method.
  • Keywords
    Hydrogen diffusion , Neutron radiography , in-situ , Imaging , Carrier gas hot extraction
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Record number

    1865685