Title of article
The advantage of using in-situ methods for studying hydrogen mass transport: Neutron radiography vs. carrier gas hot extraction
Author/Authors
Griesche، نويسنده , , Axel and Solَrzano، نويسنده , , Eusebio and Beyer، نويسنده , , Katrin and Kannengiesser، نويسنده , , Thomas، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
5
From page
14725
To page
14729
Abstract
Neutron radiography (NR) is compared with the commonly used carrier gas hot extraction (CGHE) technique. We performed isothermal hydrogen effusion experiments at 623 K to study the mass transport kinetics. The investigated material was technical iron. The quantification of the hydrogen mass flow is done for NR by using concentration standards. The temporal hydrogen concentration evolution in the sample coincides well for both methods, i.e. NR and CGHE, and is in good agreement with literature. The advantages of the NR method are the non-destructive nature of measuring and the in-situ determination of hydrogen concentrations with high spatial and temporal resolution. Remaining hydrogen inside the sample can be identified directly by the NR method.
Keywords
Hydrogen diffusion , Neutron radiography , in-situ , Imaging , Carrier gas hot extraction
Journal title
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Record number
1865685
Link To Document