Title of article
A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study
Author/Authors
Edwards، نويسنده , , T.Bradley and Kadakia، نويسنده , , Nimish R and Boulahia، نويسنده , , Aziz and Kempf، نويسنده , , Jean-François and Boileau، نويسنده , , Pascal and Némoz، نويسنده , , Chantal and Walch، نويسنده , , Gilles، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
7
From page
207
To page
213
Abstract
Six hundred one total shoulder arthroplasties and eighty-nine hemiarthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patients were evaluated with a physical examination, Constant score, and radiographic evaluation. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. At follow-up, the Constant score averaged 64 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 86%, active anterior elevation averaged 130°, and active external rotation averaged 36° for the hemiarthroplasties. The Constant score averaged 70 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 96%, active anterior elevation averaged 145°, and active external rotation averaged 42° for the total shoulder arthroplasties. Eighty-six percent of hemiarthroplasties and ninety-four percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had good or excellent results. Differences were statistically significant for all parameters. Total shoulder arthroplasty provided better scores for pain, mobility, and activity than hemiarthroplasty. Fifty-six percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had a radiolucent line around the glenoid component. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides results superior to those of hemiarthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis.
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Record number
1865972
Link To Document