Arthroscopic capsular release for refractory shoulder stiffness: A critical analysis of effectiveness in specific etiologies

Hypothesis rpose of this study is to report and compare the outcome of arthroscopic capsular release in patients with shoulder stiffness with post-traumatic, postsurgical, and idiopathic etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with idiopathic or post-traumatic stiffness have better outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release than those with shoulder stiffness with a postsurgical etiology. als and Methods ospective review of 115 patients who underwent arthroscopic capsular release for refractory shoulder stiffness was performed. There were 60 men and 55 women with a mean age of 49 years (range, 27 to 81 years). The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the etiology of stiffness: post-traumatic (26 patients), postsurgical (48 patients), and idiopathic (41 patients). Arthroscopic capsular release was performed in all patients after a mean of 9 months of physical therapy (range, 6 to 13 months). s ean follow-up of 46 months (range, 25 to 89 months), the overall subjective shoulder value in all groups improved from 29% to 73% and the age- and gender-adjusted Constant score improved from 35% to 86%. The mean pain score decreased from 7.5 to 1, and mean active forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation increased from 97°, 14°, and the L5 vertebral level, respectively, to 135°, 38°, and the T11 vertebral level, respectively (P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the outcomes of idiopathic and post-traumatic stiffness (P = .7). However, the Constant score and subjective shoulder value were significantly lower in the postsurgical group compared with the idiopathic and post-traumatic groups (P = .0001 and P = .006, respectively). sions scopic capsular release is an effective treatment for refractory shoulder stiffness. Patients with idiopathic and post-traumatic shoulder stiffness have better outcomes than patients with postsurgical stiffness.