Title of article
Bone cement penetration pattern and primary stability testing in keeled and pegged glenoid components
Author/Authors
Raiss، نويسنده , , Patric and Pape، نويسنده , , Guido and Kleinschmidt، نويسنده , , Kerstin and Jنger، نويسنده , , Sebastian and Sowa، نويسنده , , Boris and Jakubowitz، نويسنده , , Eike and Loew، نويسنده , , Markus and Bruckner، نويسنده , , Thomas and Rickert، نويسنده , , Markus، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages
9
From page
723
To page
731
Abstract
Background
been proposed that bone mineral density has an influence on cement penetration in hip and knee arthroplasty. The hypotheses of this study were that: 1) there is a negative correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and cement penetration in cemented glenoid components; and 2) that implant design has an influence on cement penetration into the glenoid bone.
s
10 pairs of fresh frozen scapulas was measured. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans in 3 different sections were analyzed after implantation of keeled and pegged glenoid components using a 3rd-generation cementing technique with a vacuum mixing system. Cement penetration was analyzed and correlated with BMD. Pull-out strength testing was performed to analyze primary stability.
s
erall peak BMD was 0.6 [g/cm2] (range, 0.33–0.98). A strong negative correlation between BMD and mean cement penetration was found for the peg (R2 = −.83; P < .003) and for the keel group (R2 = −.81; P < .005). Mean cement penetration was 78.4 mm2 (range, 60.6–94.2) in the keel and 113.9 mm2 (range, 78.2–143.4) in the peg group (P < .0001). In all cases, the components were pulled out of the cement mantle, whereas the bone-cement interfaces remained intact. The mean pull-out strength was 1093N (764–1343N) for keeled and 884N (650–1264N) for pegged components (P < .05).
sion
rn cementing technique, leading to a deep bonding between bone and cement, is crucial to prevent loosening of glenoid components. The findings of this study might help us to better understand the results of follow-up studies of cemented glenoid implants. Our results could be helpful for the choice of implants in patients with poor bone quality like osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis.
Keywords
Arthroplasty , Bone mineral density , Shoulder , TSA , Micro-CT
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Serial Year
2011
Journal title
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Record number
1868974
Link To Document