Title of article :
A review of curriculum evaluation in United Kingdom nursing education
Author/Authors :
Roxburgh، نويسنده , , Michelle and Watson، نويسنده , , Roger and Holland، نويسنده , , Karen and Johnson، نويسنده , , Martin and Lauder، نويسنده , , William and Topping، نويسنده , , Keith، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
Summary
ly we have witnessed several significant changes to the nursing curriculum in the United Kingdom (UK). This review forms part of a larger study evaluating the ‘fitness for practice’ elements of the nursing curriculum in Scotland. Systematic review methods were used including the following databases: CINAHL and BNI. Twenty six papers were retrieved and 14 remained after applying the review criteria, the main rationale being the empirical focus. It appears that there is a paucity of research in this area in the UK and papers dealt exclusively with either content, process or outcome evaluation of the nursing curriculum. National, well funded, multi-centre studies tended to be more rigorous. Results, where they were positive about curricular changes, tended to be limited. There is clearly a need for rigorous research into curriculum evaluation, both at the micro and macro level, which investigates content, process and outcome. Without such research, curriculum change will be uninformed.
Keywords :
Evaluation , EDUCATION , Nurses , Nursing , Nurse education , Curriculum
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today
Journal title :
Nurse Education Today