Title of article :
Predictive value of lipid profile for salutary coronary angiographic changes in patients on a low-fat diet and physical exercise program
Author/Authors :
Niebauer، نويسنده , , Josef and Hambrecht، نويسنده , , Rainer and Velich، نويسنده , , Tamلs and Marburger، نويسنده , , Christian and Hauer، نويسنده , , Klaus and Kreuzer، نويسنده , , Jِrg and Zimmermann، نويسنده , , Rainer and von Hodenberg، نويسنده , , Eberhard and Schlierf، نويسنده , , Günter and Schuler، نويسنده , , Gerhard and Kübler، نويسنده , , Wolfgang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages :
5
From page :
163
To page :
167
Abstract :
In this study, 113 patients with modestly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<210 mg/dl) and coronary artery disease were randomized to an intervention group (n = 56) or a control group (n = 57). The intervention program consisted of daily exercise and a low-fat diet according to the American Heart Associationʹs recommendation phase III; patients in the control group received “usual care” rendered by their private physician. After 1 year, complete data were available for all 92 patients (intervention: n = 40; control: n = 52) who underwent repeat coronary angiography. During the study course, patients in the intervention group showed an increase in apolipoprotein A-I (123 ± 18 vs 129 ± 20 mg/dl; p < 0.02) and apolipoprotein A-I/B (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.4; p < 0.01) and a decrease in apolipoprotein B (99 ± 20 vs 89 ± 18 mg/dl; p < 0.01), while apolipoprotein A-II remained unchanged (38 ± 6 vs 38 ± 6 mg/dl; p = NS). In the control group, there were no significant changes (apolipoprotein A-I, 124 ± 17 vs 128 ± 13 mg/dl; apolipoprotein A-II, 38 ± 6 vs 39 ± 6 mg/dl; apolipoprotein B, 100 ± 21 vs 99 ± 16 mg/dl; apolipoprotein A-I/B, 1.3 ± 0.3 vs 1.4 ± 0.5; all p = NS). As previously reported, there was a significant retardation of progression in patients in the intervention group (progression 23%, no change 45%, regression 32%) compared with the control group (progression 48%, no change 35%, regression 17%) (p < 0.05). Although retardation of progression was significantly associated with an increase in apolipoprotein A-I/B and a decrease in apolipoprotein B (p < 0.05), these gave way in multivariate analysis to changes in total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, absolute levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and, in a subgroup of patients, to leisure-time physical activity (all p < 0.05). These data demonstrate that an intervention based on a low-fat diet and intensive physical exercise is capable of improving apolipoprotein levels, associated with retardation of progression of coronary artery disease. However, total cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol appear superior to apolipoproteins as metabolic markers for effective treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
1996
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1883228
Link To Document :
بازگشت