Right Ventricular Stiffness Measured by a New Method Without Volume Estimation in Coronary Artery Disease

This study was designed to measure the right ventricular (RV) stiffness (ΔP/ΔV) with a new method without estimating the RV volume itself. RV stiffness has rarely been measured due to the difficulty in estimating the RV volume. Without measuring RV volume itself, stiffness can be determined by measuring its volume change (ΔV). Tricuspid filling flow volume, which is the diastolic RV ΔV, is measurable by using Doppler echocardiography. Thus, RV stiffness may possibly be obtained from Doppler echocardiography combined with high-fidelity RV pressure. Subjects consisted of 8 controls, 8 patients with angina pectoris, 8 with anterior, 8 with posterior, and 8 with inferior prior myocardial infarction. Tricuspid annular dimension was measured by 2-dimensional echocardiography and the tricuspid annular area was calculated. Velocity-time integral of the tricuspid filling flow during the late diastole was measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Then, the late diastolic RV ΔV was obtained as the product of the tricuspid annular area and the integral. The late diastolic RV pressure rise (ΔP) was also measured with a micromanometer catheter. The RV elastic chamber stiffness constant ([ΔP/ΔV]/P) was obtained by dividing simple stiffness by the mean RV pressure during late diastole. The RV elastic chamber stiffness constant did not significantly differ among controls, patients with angina pectoris, and those with anterior and posterior myocardial infarction (0.0054 ± 0.0009 vs 0.0057 ± 0.0018 vs 0.0064 ± 0.002 vs 0.0052 ± 0.0019 ml−1). However, it was significantly increased in patients with inferior myocardial infarction (0.010 ± 0.004 ml−1, p <0.01 or 0.05) compared with those in the other 4 groups. These results suggest (1) that RV stiffness can be measured with a new method without RV volume estimation, and (2) that this new method is useful in evaluating RV diastolic pathophysiology in patients with coronary artery disease. (Am J Cardiol 1996;78:298–303)