Effect of Electrode Position on Outcome of Low-Energy Intracardiac Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the new method of low-energy, catheter-based intracardiac cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and to compare 2 different lead positions. Accordingly, we prospectively studied 80 consecutive patients with chronic AF (9.8 ± 7.9 months) who were randomly assigned to undergo internal cardioversion either via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and coronary sinus (coronary sinus group) or via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and left pulmonary artery (pulmonary artery group). Intracardiac shocks were delivered by an external defibrillator synchronized to the QRS complex. After conversion, all patients were treated orally with sotalol (mean daily dose, 189 ± 63 mg/day). For conversion to sinus rhythm, the overall mean energy requirement was 5.6 ± 3.1 J. In the coronary sinus group, cardioversion was achieved in 35 of 38 patients at a mean energy level of 4.1 ± 2.3 J (range 1.0 to 9.9), and in the pulmonary artery group in 39 of 42 patients with 7.2 ± 3.1 J (range 2.5 to 14.8). Although there was no difference with regard to success rate, the energy differed significantly between the 2 groups (p <0.01). Mean lead impedance was 56.4 ± 7.0 Ω and 54.6 ± 8.4 Ω, respectively (p = NS). No serious complications were observed in either lead group. At a mean follow-up of 14.2 ± 7.0 months, 54% and 56%, respectively, of patients who had been converted successfully remained in sinus rhythm. Thus, low-energy biphasic shocks delivered between the right atrium and coronary sinus or pulmonary artery are equally effective for cardioversion of patients with chronic AF. The energy requirements for conversion from a pulmonary artery electrode position are higher than for the coronary sinus position. al cardioversion of atrial fibrillation has been demonstrated to be superior to external cardioversion with respect to energy requirements, effectiveness, and need for sedation. In this study, 2 different electrode positions were compared for internal cardioversion, showing the coronary sinus-right atrium position, although equally effective, to be more favorable than the pulmonary artery-right atrium position regarding energy requirements.