Author/Authors :
Rastegar-Lari، Abdolaziz نويسنده Antimicrobial Resistant Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Rastegar-Lari, Abdolaziz , Ghaffariyeh، Alireza نويسنده Kosar Hospital, Shiraz, Fars, Iran Ghaffariyeh, Alireza , Etesam، Noushi نويسنده Exir Pharmaceutical Company, Tehran, Iran Etesam, Noushi , Mostafavi Abdolmaleky، Hamid نويسنده , , Alaghehbandan، Reza نويسنده Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada Alaghehbandan, Reza
Abstract :
Background:
Acute sinusitis constitutes a significant portion of health service utilization globally both in- and outpatient
as well as emergency department visits, with 83% resulting in a prescription for an antibiotic. This study
compared the efficacy of a 5-day regimen of azithromycin (a macrolid antibiotic) with a 10-day regimen of coamoxiclav
(combination of an aminopenicillin with a betalactamase inhibitor) for the treatment of acute sinusitis.
Patients and methods:
A total of 76 subjects with acute sinusitis were randomly assigned in two groups, azithromycin
(n=40) and co-amoxiclav (n=36). One group received azithromycin, 500mg in the first day and 250mg for 4 days and
the other group received co-amoxiclav 625mg, 3 times a day for 10 days. Patients were visited 4 times during the study
(baseline, phone call, end of treatment, end of study) and regression/progression of their symptoms and their response to the treatment was evaluated.
Results:
There was no significant difference between the two groupsʹ demographic and clinical presentations. Duration
of regression of the symptoms in the azithromycin group was significantly shorter than the co-amoxiclav group (7.6 days
versus 10.6, p=0.03). Clinical success rate at end of the study was 80% for azithromycin and 66.7% for co-amoxiclav
(p=0.025). Clinical success rates among females in both groups seemed to be higher than males, but this difference was
not statistically significant (p=0.13).
Conclusion:
Results revealed that azithromycin regimen is more efficient, has less side effects, and required shorter
treatment period. Patients were able to tolerate the medications better with a higher compliance and less economic cost
than co-amoxiclav regimen.