Author/Authors :
Khorvash، Farzin نويسنده , , Mostafavizadeh، Kamyar نويسنده , , Mobasherizadeh، Sina نويسنده , , Behjati، Mohaddeseh نويسنده , , SALEHI، MANSOOR نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background:
The rapid emergence of antibiotic resistance, especially broad-spectrum antibiotics, resulted in the avid
use of new potent antibiotics. Ceftriaxone and ceftazidime, two third-generation cephalosporin, are usually used to
manage complicated and uncomplicated infections. The use of cefepime in resistant infections is increasing gradually,
which put this potent antibiotic at risk of resistance.
Patients and methods:
During an 18-month period, a total of 220 gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas spp,
Serratia spp, Acinetobacter spp, Proteus spp, E-coli and Klebsiella spp. have been isolated by standard microbiological
methods from nosocomial surgical site, abscess, blood stream and urinary tract infections. MIC of antibiotics on isolated
bacteria was determined by gradient concentration method.
Results:
Totally, 29.4%, 19.5% and 23.3% of isolated bacteria with MIC?8?g/ml were sensitive to cefepime,
ceftriaxone and ceftazidime, respectively. High level resistance with MIC?256?g/ml to cefepime, ceftriaxone and
ceftazidime was also observed in 47.1%, 70.8% and 62.5% of cases, respectively (p < 0.05). High level resistance to
cefepime were more commonly observed for pseudomonas (73.1%) and Klebsiella spp. (73.5%), respectively (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
According to CLSI criteria, 47.1% of isolated bacteria in this study showed high level of resistance
(MIC?256?g/ml) to cefepime. Therefore application of cefepime, as a drug of choice, for gram-negative organisms is
not reasonable. Our result demonstrated that this potent antibiotic should not be used as a choice for empiric antibiotic
therapy, in the cases of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative organisms.