Title of article :
Patterns of enlarged lymph nodes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Author/Authors :
Hadley، نويسنده , , David A. and Stephenson، نويسنده , , Robert A. and Samlowski، نويسنده , , Wolfram E. and Dechet، نويسنده , , Christopher B.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages :
5
From page :
751
To page :
755
Abstract :
Objective iewed the imaging studies of patients with known metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in order to more accurately assess where retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy occurs. s tabase of patients with metastatic RCC was reviewed and 101 patients were found from 2002 to 2006. Each patientʹs CT scans were then reviewed. Twenty-seven retroperitoneal sections were defined for each patient, with 3 positions in each of the x-, y-, and z-axis. Lymph nodes greater than 1 cm were then counted for each section. s 101 patients, 31, of whom 28 qualified, were found to have retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy of a least 1 cm or greater. Two-thirds of nodes (87 out of 124) exhibited a suprahilar, intra-aortocaval, and retro-aortocaval trend of lymph node enlargement. Three patients (11%) had isolated infrahilar nodes, while 8 patients (29%) exhibited a skip lesion pattern by imaging criteria. Only 4 patients (14%) were noted to have lymph nodes that were confined to the ipsilateral (paraaortic or paracaval) nodes in the perihilar and infrahilar region, which would be readily accessible during renal surgery. sions tic drainage in RCC is ill-defined, likely due to multiple lymphatic outflow channels. However, after a review of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy imaging in patients with known metastatic RCC, there does seem to be a cephalad, posterior, and medial drainage pattern.
Keywords :
Lymphadenopathy , retroperitoneal , Metastatic , renal cell carcinoma
Journal title :
Urologic Oncology
Serial Year :
2011
Journal title :
Urologic Oncology
Record number :
1890375
Link To Document :
بازگشت