Title of article :
Quantitative angiographic analysis of stent restenosis in the scripps coronary radiation to inhibit intimal proliferation post stenting (SCRIPPS) trial
Author/Authors :
Lansky، نويسنده , , Alexandra J and Popma، نويسنده , , Jeffrey J and Massullo، نويسنده , , Vincent and Jani، نويسنده , , Shirish and Russo، نويسنده , , Robert J and Schatz، نويسنده , , Richard A and Steuterman، نويسنده , , Stephen and Guarneri، نويسنده , , Ermina M and Wu، نويسنده , , Hongsheng and Mehran، نويسنده , , Roxana and Mintz، نويسنده , , Gary S. and Leon MD، نويسنده , , Martin B and Teirste، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages :
5
From page :
410
To page :
414
Abstract :
To identify luminal dimension changes occurring within the stent alone and within the stent + margin segment, we reviewed the quantitative angiographic results obtained from the Scripps Coronary Radiation to Inhibit Proliferation Post Stenting (SCRIPPS) trial, a prospective randomized trial assessing the effect of iridium-192 (Ir-192) on the prevention of stent restenosis. Fifty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive Ir-192 or placebo sources after successful intervention. Procedural and 6-month follow-up cineangiograms were quantitatively reviewed in 52 patients to identify changes within the stent and the stent + margin segment. The percent diameter stenosis was lower within the stent than within the stent + margin segment after the procedure (6 ± 22% vs 21± 15%, p <0.0001) and at follow-up (28 ± 29% vs 42 ± 21%, p <0.0001). As a result, a lower restenosis rate was found within the stent than within the stent + margin (25% vs 37%, p <0.0001); isolated stent margin restenosis occurred in 11.5% of lesions. Treatment with Ir-192 reduced restenosis within the stent (8% vs 39%; p = 0.010) and within the stent + margin segment (17% vs 54%; p = 0.010); the reduction in restenosis at the margin only (8.3% vs 14.3%, p = 0.503) was not significant. The lowest relative risk for restenosis resulting from Ir-192 occurred within the stent (0.21; 95% confidecne interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.86) compared with the stent + margin segment (0.31; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.81) or the stent margin (0.58; 95% CI 0.12 to 2.91). In the SCRIPPS trial, 32% of restenosis occurred at the stent margins. Treatment with Ir-192 reduced restenosis primarily within the stent rather than the margin. Whether extending the treatment length to fully include the stent margins will further reduce restenosis requires further study.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
1999
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1891321
Link To Document :
بازگشت