Title of article :
Extent and distribution of in-stent intimal hyperplasia and edge effect in a non-radiation stent population
Author/Authors :
Weissman، نويسنده , , Neil J and Wilensky، نويسنده , , Robert L and Tanguay، نويسنده , , Jean-Francois and Bartorelli، نويسنده , , Antonio L and Moses، نويسنده , , Jeffery R. Williams، نويسنده , , David O and Bailey، نويسنده , , Steven and Martin، نويسنده , , Jack L and Canos، نويسنده , , Michael R and Rudra، نويسنده , , Harish and Popma، نويسنده , , Jeffrey J and Leon، نويسنده , , Martin B and ، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages :
5
From page :
248
To page :
252
Abstract :
Intimal hyperplasia within the body of the stent is the primary mechanism for in-stent restenosis; however, stent edge restenosis has been described after brachytherapy. Our current understanding about the magnitude of in vivo intimal hyperplasia and edge restenosis is limited to data obtained primarily from select, symptomatic patients requiring repeat angiography. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent and distribution of intimal hyperplasia both within the stent and along the stent edge in relatively nonselect, asymptomatic patients scheduled for 6-month intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as part of a multicenter trial: Heparin Infusion Prior to Stenting. Planar IVUS measurements 1 mm apart were obtained throughout the stent and over a length of 10 mm proximal and distal to the stent at index and follow-up. Of the 179 patients enrolled, 140 returned for repeat angiography and IVUS at 6.4 ± 1.9 months and had IVUS images adequate for analysis. Patients had 1.2 ± 0.6 Palmaz-Schatz stents per vessel. There was a wide individual variation of intimal hyperplasia distribution within the stent and no mean predilection for any location. At 6 months, intimal hyperplasia occupied 29.3 ± 16.2% of the stent volume on average. Lumen loss within 2 mm of the stent edge was due primarily to intimal proliferation. Beyond 2 mm, negative remodeling contributed more to lumen loss. Gender, age, vessel location, index plaque burden, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and tobacco did not predict luminal narrowing at the stent edges, but diabetes, unstable angina at presentation, and lesion length were predictive of in-stent intimal hyperplasia. In a non-radiation stent population, 29% of the stent volume is filled with intimal hyperplasia at 6 months. Lumen loss at the stent edge is due primarily to intimal proliferation.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2001
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1893041
Link To Document :
بازگشت