Title of article :
Capsular invasion in renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis
Author/Authors :
Song، نويسنده , , Turun and Yin، نويسنده , , Yuan and Liao، نويسنده , , Banghua and Zheng، نويسنده , , Shuo and Wei، نويسنده , , Qiang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Abstract :
Objectives
ar invasion is frequently detected in localized renal cell carcinoma (RCCs) samples. Whether patients with localized RCCs and capsular invasion will suffer poorer clinical outcome than those without this pathologic finding is still at issue.
als and methods
formed a systematic literature research of Central, Medline, Embase, and Chinese database CNKI and VIP. Cohort studies comparing the prognosis in patients with localized RCCs and with or without capsular invasion were included. Incidence of capsular invasion in different Fuhrman grade, primary TNM stage, and clinical outcome were analyzed.
s
hort studies with 2,295 eligible patients were identified. Capsular invasion was presented in 500 specimens (21.79%). Lower grade (Fuhrman I/II vs. Fuhrman III/IV) and stage (pT1 vs. pT2) diseases were associated with lower incidence of capsular invasion, with OR = 0.56, 95% CI[0.37–0.85] and OR = 0.35, 95% CI[0.25–0.49], respectively. Our pooled analysis showed patients with capsular invasive had 1.80 times the risk of tumor recurrence than patients without these findings (HR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.21, 2.68]), and patients with localized RCCs and capsular invasion were detected at 4.93 times risk in developing cancer related death than those without its presence during follow up (HR = 4.93, 95% CI [2.14, 11.35]).
sion
ts with localized RCCs and capsular invasion are of poorer prognosis than those without this finding. Capsular invasion may serve as an additional factor in stratifying patient with localized RCCs.
Keywords :
Prognosis , META-ANALYSIS , renal cell carcinoma , Capsular invasion
Journal title :
Urologic Oncology
Journal title :
Urologic Oncology