Author/Authors :
Matsushita، نويسنده , , Takehiko and Badhwar، نويسنده , , Nitish and Collins، نويسنده , , Kathryn K. and Van Hare، نويسنده , , George F and Barbato، نويسنده , , Gaetano and Lee، نويسنده , , Byron K and Lee، نويسنده , , Randall J and Scheinman، نويسنده , , Melvin M، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
To compare usefulness of a ventricular extrastimulus (VES) from the right ventricular (RV) apex versus the RV septum in patients with a septal accessory pathway (AP), VES was applied from the RV apex and the summit of the RV septum in patients with septal APs. A VES from the RV apex and from the summit was diagnostic of the presence of an AP in 13 of 28 patients (83%) and in 10 of 12 patients, respectively (46% p <0.05), and VES proved an AP as a part of the tachycardia circuit in 5 of 28 patients (18%) and 6 of 12 patients, respectively (50%, p <0.05). A VES during His bundle refractoriness from the RV summit increases the diagnostic yield for both the presence of an AP and its participation in the tachycardia circuit with respect to RV apical VES.
