Title of article :
Comparison of temporary occlusion and aspiration system versus the conventional method during coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction
Author/Authors :
Kusuyama، نويسنده , , Takanori and Kataoka، نويسنده , , Toru and Iida، نويسنده , , Hidetaka and Uchida، نويسنده , , Eiji and Matsuura، نويسنده , , Hitoe and Tanaka، نويسنده , , Hidemasa and Sato، نويسنده , , Hiroshi and Shimodozono، نويسنده , , Shinichi and Bonneau، نويسنده , , Heidi N. and Kobayashi، نويسنده , , Yoshiki and Yoshiyama، نويسنده , , Minoru and Yoshikawa، نويسنده , , Junichi، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
3
From page :
1041
To page :
1043
Abstract :
This study evaluated the effects of the temporary occlusion and aspiration device GuardWire on percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. This device brought about a significant reduction in the no-reflow phenomenon and improvement in ST resolution compared with conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1898247
Link To Document :
بازگشت