Title of article
Early- and Medium-Term Outcomes After Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation for Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Failure
Author/Authors
Lee، نويسنده , , Steve S. and Price، نويسنده , , Matthew J. and Wong، نويسنده , , Garrett B. and Valencia، نويسنده , , Rafael and Damani، نويسنده , , Samir and Sawhney، نويسنده , , Neil and Gollapudi، نويسنده , , Raghava R. and Schatz، نويسنده , , Richard A. and Teirstein، نويسنده , , Paul S.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
4
From page
1345
To page
1348
Abstract
The optimal treatment for sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) restenosis is not known. This study evaluated the safety and clinical outcome of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation for SES restenosis. From March 2004 to July 2005, PESs were implanted in 125 patients with 140 lesions with SES restenosis. Acute and 6-month clinical outcomes were determined through review of the medical record and/or telephone interview. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) occurred in 14 patients (11.2%), driven entirely by postprocedure non–Q-wave myocardial infarction. At a mean clinical follow-up of 7.2 ± 1.8 months, the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 14.0%, and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 17.2%. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (1.6%). Length of PES implanted, postprocedure diameter stenosis, and total occlusion of the target lesion were independent predictors of TLR. In patients with de novo SES restenosis, TLR was only 8.7%. In conclusion, at medium-term follow-up, PES implantation for SES failure appears to be safe and effective, although efficacy is decreased in the setting of total occlusions, greater residual diameter stenosis, and longer PESs.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1901658
Link To Document