Title of article
Comparison of Defibrillation Efficacy and Survival Associated With Right Versus Left Pectoral Placement for Implantable Defibrillators
Author/Authors
Gold، نويسنده , , Michael R. and Shih، نويسنده , , Hue-Teh and Herre، نويسنده , , John and Breiter، نويسنده , , David and Zhang، نويسنده , , Yunlong and Schwartz، نويسنده , , Mark، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
4
From page
243
To page
246
Abstract
The preferred location for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator is the left pectoral region as a result of the shock vector formed by the active can and the lead system. However, a right pectoral site is necessary when left-sided implantation is contraindicated. The Low Energy Safety Study was a prospective, randomized trial conducted to assess chronic defibrillation efficacy in 627 patients, including 37 (5.9%) who received right pectoral implants and 590 (94.1%) who received left pectoral implants. Patients were followed for a mean of 24 ± 13 months. There were no significant differences observed between patients who received left versus right pectoral implants in age, gender, indications, New York Heart Association classification, or ejection fraction. Patients who received a right pectoral implant had higher defibrillation thresholds at implantation (10.6 ± 3.8 J) than those who received a left pectoral implant (8.9 ± 4.2 J, p = 0.01) despite similar shock impedances. The conversion efficacy for spontaneous arrhythmia episodes among patients who received right and left pectoral implants were not significantly different (33 of 33 [100%] vs 255 of 263 [97%], respectively; p = 0.31). In addition, the conversion efficacy for induced ventricular fibrillation episodes were also similar (187 of 188 [99%] on the right vs 2429 of 2475 [98%] on the left, p = 0.18). However, the all-cause mortality rate was higher for patients who received right-sided implants (hazard ratio 1.93, p <0.004). In conclusion, defibrillation thresholds are higher with right pectoral implants compared with left-sided implants, but with a proper energy safety margin, there are no significant differences in spontaneous or induced shock conversion efficacy. However, the near doubling of the mortality rate among patients with right-sided implants needs to be considered when recommending such device therapy.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1901886
Link To Document