Title of article
Optimizing the Programation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block
Author/Authors
Vidal، نويسنده , , Bàrbara and Sitges، نويسنده , , Marta and Marigliano، نويسنده , , Alba and Delgado، نويسنده , , Victoria and Dيaz-Infante، نويسنده , , Ernesto and Azqueta، نويسنده , , Manel and Tamborero، نويسنده , , David and Tolosana، نويسنده , , José Marيa and Berruezo، نويسنده , , Antonio and Pérez-Villa، نويسنده , , Félix and Paré، نويسنده , , Carles and Mont، نويسنده , , Lluيs and Brugad، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
5
From page
1002
To page
1006
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the clinical impact of cardiac resynchronization device optimization. A series of 100 consecutive patients received cardiac resynchronization therapy. In the first 49 patients, an empirical atrioventricular delay of 120 ms was set, with simultaneous biventricular stimulation (interventricular [VV] interval = 0 ms). In the next 51 patients, systematic atrioventricular optimization was performed. VV optimization was also performed, selecting 1 VV delay: right or left ventricular preactivation (+30 or −30 ms) or simultaneous (VV interval = 0 ms), according to the best synchrony obtained by tissue Doppler–derived wall displacement. At follow-up, patients who were alive without cardiac transplantation and showed improvement of ≥10% in the distance walked in the 6-minute walking test were considered responders. There were no differences between the 2 groups at baseline. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved in the 2 groups, but left ventricular cardiac output improved only in the optimized group. At 6 months, patients with optimized devices walked slightly further in the 6-minute walking test (497 ± 167 vs 393 ± 123 m, p <0.01), with no differences in New York Heart Association functional class or quality of life compared with nonoptimized patients. Overall, the number of nonresponders were similar in the 2 groups (27% vs 23%, p = NS). In conclusion, the echocardiographic optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices provided a slight incremental clinical benefit at midterm follow-up. Simple and rapid methods to routinely optimize the devices are warranted.
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number
1902165
Link To Document