• Title of article

    Comparison of Brachial Artery Wall Thickness Versus Endothelial Function to Predict Late Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography

  • Author/Authors

    Alois Suessenbacher، نويسنده , , Alois and Dِrler، نويسنده , , Jakob and Wunder، نويسنده , , Johannes and Hohenwarter، نويسنده , , Fabian and Alber، نويسنده , , Hannes F. and Pachinger، نويسنده , , Otmar and Frick، نويسنده , , Matthias، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    671
  • To page
    675
  • Abstract
    An increased brachial artery intima media thickness (BA-IMT) has been shown to be of prognostic value. Conflicting prognostic data have been reported for brachial artery flow–mediated vasodilation (BA-FMD), and the longest evaluated follow-up period to date is 5.5 years. We sought to investigate the very late prognostic value of BA-IMT and BA-FMD in 396 consecutive patients (age 54 ± 9 years) admitted for invasive evaluation of chest pain. BA-IMT and BA-FMD were measured using high-resolution ultrasonography. The patients were divided according to the median BA-IMT (0.37 mm) and median BA-FMD (7.6%). After a mean follow-up of 141 ± 12 months, cardiovascular events were documented. More cardiovascular events were found in patients with an increased BA-IMT (50 vs 78 events, p = 0.003). When the groups were compared according to the median BA-FMD, no differences in the number of events were documented (70 vs 75 events, p = 0.60). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, including age, number of risk factors, BA diameter, presence of coronary artery disease, BA-FMD, and BA-IMT, only the presence of coronary artery disease and BA-IMT remained significantly associated with outcome. In conclusion, BA-IMT, but not BA-FMD, predicted cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death with ≤12 years of follow-up in patients undergoing an invasive evaluation of chest pain. Our results represent, by far, the longest follow-up of BA-IMT and peripheral endothelial function testing compared with previously reported data.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Serial Year
    2013
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Cardiology
  • Record number

    1903329