Title of article :
Comparison of Benazepril Plus Amlodipine or Hydrochlorothiazide in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease
Author/Authors :
Bakris، نويسنده , , George and Briasoulis، نويسنده , , Alexandros and Dahlof، نويسنده , , Bjorn and Jamerson، نويسنده , , Kenneth and Weber، نويسنده , , Michael A. and Kelly، نويسنده , , Roxzana Y. and Hester، نويسنده , , Allen and Hua، نويسنده , , Tsushung and Zappe، نويسنده , , Dion and Pitt، نويسنده , , Bertram، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
5
From page :
255
To page :
259
Abstract :
Combination therapy with benazepril 40 mg and amlodipine 10 mg (B+A) has been shown to be more effective than benazepril 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg (B+H) in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk patients with stage 2 hypertension with similar blood pressure reductions. In the present post hoc analysis, we evaluated whether B+A is more effective than B+H for reducing CV events in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline in a subgroup analysis of the Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) study. The main trial randomized 11,506 patients. Of those, 5,744 received B+A and 5,762 received B+H. Of the 11,506 patients, 5,314 (46%) were classified as having CAD at baseline. The mean patient follow-up period was 35.7 months for the B+A group and 35.6 months for the B+H group. The primary end point was the interval to the first event of composite CV morbidity and mortality. At baseline, significant differences were present between the 5,314 with CAD and the 6,192 without CAD. The patients with CAD had a lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate, a lower incidence of diabetes, and greater incidence of dyslipidemia. However, no baseline differences were found between the randomized B+A and B+H groups. In the patients with CAD, an 18% reduction occurred in the hazard ratio for CV events (primary end point) with B+A versus B+H (p = 0.0016). In a prespecified secondary analysis of the composite end point, including only CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, the hazard ratio in the patients with CAD was reduced by 25% (p = 0.0033) in the B+A group compared with the B+H group. B+A was more effective than B+H at comparable blood pressure reductions for reducing CV events in patients, regardless of the presence of CAD. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the combination of B+A should be preferentially used for older patients with high-risk, stage 2 hypertension.
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
American Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
1903596
Link To Document :
بازگشت