Author/Authors :
Peters، نويسنده , , Maarten J.V. and Jelicic، نويسنده , , Marko and Gorski، نويسنده , , Benny and Sijstermans، نويسنده , , Kevin and Giesbrecht، نويسنده , , Timo and Merckelbach، نويسنده , , Harald، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Effects of attention control and forewarning on the activation and monitoring of experimentally induced false memories in the Deese/Roediger–McDermott paradigm were investigated in a young adult sample (N = 77). We found that reducing the degree of attention during encoding led to a decrease in veridical recall and an increase in non-presented critical lure intrusions. This effect could not be counteracted by a forewarning instruction. However, these findings did not emerge in a (retrieval supportive) recognition task. It seems that divided attention increases false recall when attention control and forewarning have to compete for limited cognitive resources in a generative free recall as opposed to a retrieval supportive recognition task. Forewarning instructions do not always protect young adults against experimentally induced false memories.
Keywords :
False memory , Activation-monitoring , DRM paradigm , attention , Forewarning