Title of article
Behavior of nickel catalysts in supercritical water gasification of glucose: Influence of support
Author/Authors
Lu، نويسنده , , Youjun and Zhu، نويسنده , , Yiming and Li، نويسنده , , Sha and Zhang، نويسنده , , Ximin and Guo، نويسنده , , Liejin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages
12
From page
125
To page
136
Abstract
The catalytic performance of Ni-based supercritical water gasification (SCWG) catalysts may be influenced strongly by the nature of support. In this paper, Ni catalysts with the different supports (CeO2/Al2O3, La2O3/Al2O3, MgO/Al2O3, ZrO2/Al2O3) were prepared by two-step impregnation method. The fresh and used catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with an Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Thermo-gravimetric analyses (TGA). The catalyst performance testing was conducted by SCWG of glucose at 673 K and 23.5 MPa with an autoclave reactor, to evaluate the influence of support on the hydrogen production. The results showed that H2 yield for different supports decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3 > La2O3/Al2O3 > MgO/Al2O3 > Al2O3 > ZrO2/Al2O3, and H2 selectivity decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3 > La2O3/Al2O3 > ZrO2/Al2O3 > Al2O3 > MgO/Al2O3. Ni catalysts were deactivated in SCWG reaction because of sintering and coke deposition. Compared with other supports, CeO2 can be used as the promoter of carbon removal from catalyst surfaces.
Keywords
Hydrogen production , Coke deposition , Supercritical water gasification , Support , Ni catalysts
Journal title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Record number
1919705
Link To Document