Author/Authors :
Wyman، نويسنده , , Charles E. and Balan، نويسنده , , Venkatesh and Dale، نويسنده , , Bruce E. and Elander، نويسنده , , Richard T. and Falls، نويسنده , , Matthew and Hames، نويسنده , , Bonnie and Holtzapple، نويسنده , , Mark T. and Ladisch، نويسنده , , Michael R. and Lee، نويسنده , , Y.Y. and Mosier، نويسنده , , Nathan and Pallapolu، نويسنده , , Venkata R. and Shi، نويسنده , , Jian and Thomas، نويسنده , , Ste، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Dilute sulfuric acid (DA), sulfur dioxide (SO2), liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), and lime pretreatments were applied to Alamo, Dacotah, and Shawnee switchgrass. Application of the same analytical methods and material balance approaches facilitated meaningful comparisons of glucose and xylose yields from combined pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Use of a common supply of cellulase, beta-glucosidase, and xylanase also eased comparisons. All pretreatments enhanced sugar recovery from pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis substantially compared to untreated switchgrass. Adding beta-glucosidase was effective early in enzymatic hydrolysis while cellobiose levels were high but had limited effect on longer term yields at the enzyme loadings applied. Adding xylanase improved yields most for higher pH pretreatments where more xylan was left in the solids. Harvest time had more impact on performance than switchgrass variety, and microscopy showed changes in different features could impact performance by different pretreatments.
Keywords :
Yields , Hydrolysis , pretreatment , switchgrass , Microscopy