Title of article :
Functional mental capacity is not independent of the severity of psychosis
Author/Authors :
Rutledge، نويسنده , , Emer and Kennedy، نويسنده , , Miriam and OʹNeill، نويسنده , , Helen J. Kennedy، نويسنده , , Harry G.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages :
10
From page :
9
To page :
18
Abstract :
Background on-specific mental capacities are the legal criteria for competence. These are regarded as superior to clinical assessments of mental state and general function. ermine whether tests of fitness to plead and capacity to consent are independent of each other and independent of mental state and global function in psychosis. cCAT-T and MacCAT-FP, PANSS and GAF were administered to 102 compulsorily detained forensic patients with psychosis. Criteria for incompetence were inability to express a preference concerning treatment, and independent rating as unfit to plead. s -T, MacCAT-FP totals and sub-scales correlated with each other and with PANSS and GAF. Those independently rated unfit to plead or who were incapable of making a treatment choice scored significantly worse on all rating scales. No test had satisfactory sensitivity or specificity. sions definitions of mind and of functional capacity offer a basis for structured clinical judgement regarding decision-making capacity. However, function-specific measures of understanding, reasoning and appreciation generate much the same results as measures of mental state and global functioning. ation of interest
Journal title :
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Serial Year :
2008
Journal title :
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Record number :
1952463
Link To Document :
بازگشت