Title of article
Is it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to prevent spousal violence?
Author/Authors
Guedj، نويسنده , , Myriam and Muٌoz Sastre، نويسنده , , Maria Teresa and Mullet، نويسنده , , Etienne and Sorum، نويسنده , , Paul Clay Sorum، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
7
From page
108
To page
114
Abstract
Study question
s it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to protect the wife of a potentially violent patient?
s
y persons, 13 nursing personnel, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists in France indicated this acceptability in 48 scenarios. The scenarios were all combinations of 5 factors: gravity of threat (death or beating), certainty of mental illness (certain or not), time spent talking with patient (considerable or little), his attitude toward psychotherapy (rejection, indecision, or acceptance), and whether the physician consulted an expert.
s
ople favored breaking confidentiality more than did nursing personnel or psychologists. Consulting an expert had greatest impact. Lay participants were composed of groups that found breaking confidentiality “always acceptable” (22 participants), “depending on many circumstances” (106), requiring “consultation with an expert” (31), and “never acceptable” (27).
sion
ople in France are influenced by situational factors when deciding if a psychiatrist should break confidentiality to protect a patientʹs wife.
Keywords
Patient confidentiality , Spousal abuse , FRANCE , public opinion , Patient–physician relationship , psychiatrist
Journal title
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Record number
1952658
Link To Document