• Title of article

    Is it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to prevent spousal violence?

  • Author/Authors

    Guedj، نويسنده , , Myriam and Muٌoz Sastre، نويسنده , , Maria Teresa and Mullet، نويسنده , , Etienne and Sorum، نويسنده , , Paul Clay Sorum، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    108
  • To page
    114
  • Abstract
    Study question s it acceptable for a psychiatrist to break confidentiality to protect the wife of a potentially violent patient? s y persons, 13 nursing personnel, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists in France indicated this acceptability in 48 scenarios. The scenarios were all combinations of 5 factors: gravity of threat (death or beating), certainty of mental illness (certain or not), time spent talking with patient (considerable or little), his attitude toward psychotherapy (rejection, indecision, or acceptance), and whether the physician consulted an expert. s ople favored breaking confidentiality more than did nursing personnel or psychologists. Consulting an expert had greatest impact. Lay participants were composed of groups that found breaking confidentiality “always acceptable” (22 participants), “depending on many circumstances” (106), requiring “consultation with an expert” (31), and “never acceptable” (27). sion ople in France are influenced by situational factors when deciding if a psychiatrist should break confidentiality to protect a patientʹs wife.
  • Keywords
    Patient confidentiality , Spousal abuse , FRANCE , public opinion , Patient–physician relationship , psychiatrist
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • Record number

    1952658