• Title of article

    Are two interviewers better than one?

  • Author/Authors

    Fifi?، نويسنده , , Mario and Gigerenzer، نويسنده , , Gerd، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1771
  • To page
    1779
  • Abstract
    How many interviewers per job applicant are necessary for a company to achieve the highest hit rate? Are two better than one? Condorcetʹs Jury Theorem and the “wisdom of the crowd” suggest that more is better. Under quite general conditions this study shows, surprisingly, that two interviewers are on average not superior to the best interviewer. Adding further interviewers will also not increase the expected collective hit rate when interviewers are homogeneous (i.e., their hits are nested), only doing so when interviewers are heterogeneous (i.e., their hits are not nested). The current study shows how these results depend on the number of interviewers, their expertise, and the chance of free riding, and specify the conditions when “less is more”. This analysis suggests that the best policy is to invest resources into improving the quality of the best interviewer rather than distribute these to improve the quality of many interviewers.
  • Keywords
    Wisdom of the crowd , free riding , Less is more , Best interviewer , Interview validity
  • Journal title
    Journal of Business Research
  • Serial Year
    2014
  • Journal title
    Journal of Business Research
  • Record number

    1956015