Title of article
Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study
Author/Authors
Gaudreault، نويسنده , , Caroline and Samson، نويسنده , , Réjean and Stuart، نويسنده , , Paul، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
12
From page
1535
To page
1546
Abstract
Retrofit process design can be seen as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem aiming at selecting the best alternative for improving the performance of a chemical process. There is a growing consensus that environmental considerations, including the environmental impact associated with all life cycle stages of materials, should be integrated in chemical process design. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a technique that allows quantification of those impacts. However, implementing this technique would increase the decision-making complexity and thus would necessitate systematic tools and methods. The analogy between LCA and MCDM has been recognized, but the systematic evaluation of LCA methodological choices and interpretation in this context is rarely discussed. The importance of those is demonstrated in this paper using a case study involving the implementation of de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration and an integrated newsprint mill.
Keywords
Life cycle assessment , Process design , Multi-Criteria Decision-Making , Choices and interpretation , Paper mill
Journal title
Journal of Cleaner Production
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
Journal of Cleaner Production
Record number
1958326
Link To Document