The better-than-my-average effect: The relative impact of peak and average performances in assessments of the self and others

We examine whether people call to mind different manifestations of various traits when considering what they are like than when considering what others are like. Specifically, do people think that peak manifestations of their traits and abilities best capture who they are themselves, but that other people are better captured by their average performances or trait expressions? In Studies 1a and 1b, participants were more likely to believe that their own most attractive photographs best represent their typical appearance than othersʹ do. In Study 2, participantsʹ estimates of where they stand on various trait dimensions coincided with their highest possible standing, whereas their estimates of an acquaintanceʹs standing coincided with the midpoint between the latterʹs highest and lowest possible standing. In Study 3, regression analyses revealed that studentsʹ predictions of their own final exam score were based most heavily on their highest score received to that point, but their predictions of someone elseʹs final exam score was based most heavily on that studentʹs average score. We discuss how this tendency fits in the broader literature on self-other differences in evaluation and how it contributes to above-average effect.