Title of article :
Resolving ideological conflicts by affirming opponentsʹ status: The Tea Party, Obamacare and the 2013 government shutdown
Author/Authors :
Bendersky، نويسنده , , Corinne، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Abstract :
Ideological conflicts, like those over the Affordable Care Act (ACA), are highly intractable, as demonstrated by the October 2013 partial U.S. government shutdown. The current research offers a potential resolution of ideological conflicts by affirming an opponentʹs status. Results of one experiment collected during the 2013 government shutdown and a second conducted shortly after the implementation of the health insurance marketplaces in early 2014 indicate that status affirmation induces conciliatory attitudes and a willingness to sacrifice oneʹs own outcomes in favor of ideological opponentsʹ by decreasing adversarial perceptions. These studies demonstrate that status is an important social dimension whose affirmation by an ideological opponent buffers the integrity of oneʹs identity, thereby reducing defensiveness and resistance to compromising in political conflicts.
Keywords :
Ideological dispute , Status-affirmation , Political opposition , Tea Party , Obamacare , Government shutdown
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal title :
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology