Author/Authors :
KOJURI، JAVAD نويسنده Quality Improvement in Clinical Education Research Center, Education Development Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , Amini، Mitra نويسنده Education Development and Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IRAN Amini, Mitra , Karimian، Zahra نويسنده Education Development and Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IRAN Karimian, Zahra , DEHGHANI، MOHAMMAD REZA نويسنده Quality Improvement in Clinical Teaching Research Center, Shiraz Education Center, Faculty of Medical Education, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , SABER، MAHBOOBEH نويسنده Quality improvement in clinical education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran , , BAZRAFCAN، LEILA نويسنده Quality improvement in Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , EBRAHIMI، SEDIGHEH نويسنده , , REZAEE، RITA نويسنده Quality improvement in Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran ,
Abstract :
Introduction: In the design of educational programs, much attention
has been paid to teaching methods, needs assessment, an important
part of the development of educational programs, generally is
neglected. Another important aspect in educational program design is
assessing effectiveness. The aims of this study were to design a formal
needs assessment program to define the core contents of a faculty
development program, and to determine whether participation in the
faculty development program reinforced new teaching skills.
Methods: A teacher-training program was designed at Shiraz
University of Medical Sciences to help medical instructors boost
their teaching skills. Needs assessment was done with nominal group
technique followed by a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. The
program, imparted in workshop format, covered effective teaching
methods, feedback, assessing knowledge and time management.
Instruction was in the form of lectures, group discussions, case
simulations, video presentations and role-plays. The program was
evaluated in several phases using data triangulation and multi-item
assessments of overall program quality in three major dimensions:
Kirkpatrick program evaluation model, evaluation of the
educational environment and qualitative analysis with open-ended
questions. All participants in the study belonged to the academic
staff of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (n=396).
Results: Seven main categories were derived from nominal group
techniques and questionnaires. After the program, participants
rated the quality of the program highly. They felt that the educational
intervention was appropriate and had a positive impact on their
knowledge of effective teaching methods, feedback, knowledge
assessment and time management. Assessment of the effectiveness
of the program showed that participants reported significant
improvements in their teaching abilities.
Conclusion: Our faculty development program have a significant
positive effect on medical university teaching staff members’
competencies. Further research is needed to investigate whether
the faculty development program actually results in improved
teaching performance.