Author/Authors :
Papadichev، نويسنده , , V.A، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
It is well known that it is technically difficult to fabricate small period (<8-5 mm) PM or electromagnetic undulators (both superconducting and pulsed), and that undulator field Bu and deflection parameter K = 0.934BuIu decrease drastically with diminishing undulator period Iu.
other hand, there are no major problems in producing electrostatic undulators with millimeter and submillimeter periods (of course, it is necessary to decrease undulator gap proportionally). Electrostatic undulators could be used in low-electron-energy FELs, where acceptable gain per pass is easily obtainable. The principal problem in this case is to obtain rather large electric field in the median plane of an undulator (note that 1 kG is equivalent to about 300 kV/cm if relative electron velocity vc ⋍ 1). Since electric field on electrodes is larger than in the median plane, one needs to calculate both fields and optimize undulator geometry, minimizing as far as possible the ratio of field values.
ical methods were used in this paper (conformal mapping, expansion in Fourier series) for field calculation and analysis. They allow to quickly review and compare various geometries and to obtain some dependences of field value on various parameters, in contrast to numerical calculations. Numerical calculations were performed to verify analytical methods and evaluate their applicability.
ostatic and magnetic undulators are compared, disclosing their merits and drawbacks.