Two statistical methods to validate habitat suitability models using presence-only data

Predicting species occurrence using a modelling approach based on a geographic information system (GIS) represents a new methodological tool which can be used to endorse conservation policies, on condition that models are tested for reliability. t suitability models are often used to predict species occurrence through the modelling of proper environmental variables. A major constraint in building large-scale models of species distribution is the availability of data and therefore the deductive approach is adopted. This approach is suitable for bio-diversity assessment as it can be applied to a great number of species, it does however require statistical validation, both to test the accuracy of the input information and to deal with presence data (often affected by high spatial and temporal variability). ble data are, in the large majority, represented by a small sample collected without an ad hoc sampling design and without information on species absence. Reliable information on absence is not easily obtained with animal species due to elusive behaviour, poorly accessible habitats and their activity patterns. Therefore, absence data are to be considered ambiguous. Hence the need to develop statistical tools to deal with presence-only data. Moreover, presence data are rarely geo-referenced with high precision. Often information on species presence is spatially degraded as referred to polygon within which the exact species location cannot be recovered. Consequently, the validation procedure should statistically consider this uncertainty. s paper we suggest that a compositional procedure be used when presence-only data are affected by strong spatial and temporal variability, and that a multinomial (based) procedure be used when presence-only data are geo-referenced with high precision during an ad hoc field survey. The two procedures have been tested on a large number of deductive models built to represent the distribution of vertebrate species in Italy. Results show that both procedures allow the assessment of the calibration properties of the models. The reliability of the two methods is confirmed by a model rejection pattern, determined by ecological factors, scale issues, spatial accuracy and sample size. Both procedures have a wide range of applications being threshold independent.