A critical theory of technology applied to the public discussion of geoengineering

In this piece, I examine geoengineering technologies through the lens of a critical theory of technology. A critical theory of technology aims “to account for the increasing weight of public actors in technological development” [15, p. 24]. Many argue that this is particularly necessary with respect to climate engineering since most discussions surrounding it have taken place far removed from public scrutiny. My operating assumption, in this piece, rests on an important question; namely, is democratic intervention into the use and design of technology essential and possible, whether it be on a normative level, in which democracy is understood as the overriding norm, or a practical level, in which the public is viewed as both capable and vital to perceiving and correcting the errors of so-called experts? I argue that a critical theory of technology adds an important dimension to this debate.