Author/Authors :
Lu، Hsin-Fen نويسنده Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan , , Peng، Fu-Shiang نويسنده Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan , , Chen، Shee-Uan نويسنده , , Chiu، Bao-Chu نويسنده Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan , , Yeh، Szu-Hsing نويسنده Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan , , Hsiao، Sheng-Mou نويسنده Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan ,
Abstract :
Background: We sought to determine the association between factors that affected clinical
pregnancy and live birth rates in patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)
and received intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and/or laser assisted hatching
(LAH), or neither.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the records of women
who underwent IVF with or without ICSI and/or LAH at the Far Eastern Memorial
Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan between January 2007 and December 2010 were reviewed.
We divided patients into four groups: 1. those that did not receive ICSI or LAH,
2. those that received ICSI only, 3. those that received LAH only and 4. those that
received both ICSI and LAH. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed
to determine factors associated with clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in
each group.
Results: A total of 375 women were included in the analysis. Oocyte number (OR=1.07)
affected the live birth rate in patients that did not receive either ICSI or LAH. Maternal
age (OR=0.89) and embryo transfer (ET) number (OR=1.59) affected the rate in
those that received ICSI only. Female infertility factors other than tubal affected the rate
(OR=5.92) in patients that received both ICSI and LAH. No factors were found to affect
the live birth rate in patients that received LAH only.
Conclusion: Oocyte number, maternal age and ET number and female infertility factors
other than tubal affected the live birth rate in patients that did not receive ICSI
or LAH, those that received ICSI only, and those that received both ICSI and LAH,
respectively. No factors affected the live birth rate in patients that received LAH only.
These data might assist in advising patients on the appropriateness of ICSI and LAH
after failed IVF.