Title of article :
The Correlations of Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Antral Follicle Count in Different Age Groups of Infertile Women
Author/Authors :
Barbakadze، Ludmila نويسنده Department of Reproductology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia , , Kristesashvili، Jenara نويسنده Department of Reproductology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia , , Khonelidze، Natalia نويسنده Clinic for IVF and Human Reproductive Health, Tbilisi, Georgia , , Tsagareishvili، Gia نويسنده Clinic for IVF and Human Reproductive Health, Tbilisi, Georgia ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 32 سال 2015
Abstract :
Background: The objective of our study was to identify the correlations between the
tests currently used in ovarian reserve assessment: anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle
stimulating hormone (FSH) and antral follicle count (AFC) and to distinguish the
most reliable markers for ovarian reserve in order to select an adequate strategy for the
initial stages of infertility treatment.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 112 infertile women were assessed.
Subjects were divided into three age groups: group I < 35 years (n=39), group II 35-40
years (n=31), and group III 41-46 years (n=42). AMH, FSH and AFC were determined
on days 2-3 of the patients’ menstrual cycles.
Results: There was a significantly elevated negative correlation between age and
AMH level (rs=-0.67, p < 0.0001) and AFC (rs=-0.55, p < 0.0001). We observed a
significantly positive correlation between age and FSH (rs=0.38, p < 0.0001). AMH
negatively correlated with FSH (rs=-0.48, p < 0.0001) and positively with AFC (r=-
0.71, p=0.0001). There was a moderate negative relation between FSH and AFC
(r=-0.41, p=0.0001) and moderate positive relation between age and FSH (rs=0.38,
p < 0.0001). The correlation analysis performed in separate groups showed that AMH
and AFC showed a statistically significant positive correlation for group I (r=0.57,
p < 0.0001), group II (r=0.69, p < 0.0001) and group III (r=0.47, p < 0.002). A statistically
significant correlation between FSH and AMH was detected only in groups I
(r=-0.41, p < 0.02) and II (r=-0.55, p < 0.0001). A statistically significant correlation
existed between FSH and AFC only in group III (r=-0.42, p < 0.006), as well as between
age and AFC only in group I (r=-0.35, p < 0.03).
Conclusion: Currently, AMH should be considered as the more reliable of the ovarian
reserve assessments tests compared to FSH. There is a strong positive correlation between
serum AMH level and AFC. The use of AMH combined with AFC may improve ovarian
reserve evaluation.
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility