Title of article :
Does switching to a tobacco-free waterpipe product reduce toxicant intake? A crossover study comparing CO, NO, PAH, volatile aldehydes, “tar” and nicotine yields
Author/Authors :
Shihadeh، نويسنده , , Alan and Salman، نويسنده , , Rola and Jaroudi، نويسنده , , Ezzat and Saliba، نويسنده , , Najat and Sepetdjian، نويسنده , , Elizabeth and Blank، نويسنده , , Melissa D. and Cobb، نويسنده , , Caroline O. and Eissenberg، نويسنده , , Thomas، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
Waterpipe (hookah, narghile, shisha) use has become a global phenomenon, with numerous product variations. One variation is a class of products marketed as “tobacco-free” alternatives for the “health conscious user”. In this study toxicant yields from waterpipes smoked using conventional tobacco-based and tobacco-free preparations were compared. A human-mimic waterpipe smoking machine was used to replicate the puffing sequences of 31 human participants who completed two double-blind ad libitum smoking sessions in a controlled clinical setting: once with a tobacco-based product of their choosing and once with a flavor-matched tobacco-free product. Outcome measures included yields of carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, volatile aldehydes, nicotine, tar, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Smoke from both waterpipe preparations contained substantial quantities of toxicants. Nicotine yield was the only outcome that differed significantly between preparations. These findings contradict advertising messages that “herbal” waterpipe products are a healthy alternative to tobacco products.
Keywords :
CARBON MONOXIDE , Tobacco , Hookah , Narghile , Shisha , nicotine
Journal title :
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Journal title :
Food and Chemical Toxicology