• Title of article

    Numerical analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of a weakened root after adhesive reconstruction and post-core rehabilitation

  • Author/Authors

    Mattos، نويسنده , , C.M.A. and Las Casas، نويسنده , , E.B. and Dutra، نويسنده , , I.G.R. and Sousa، نويسنده , , H.A. and Guerra، نويسنده , , S.M.G.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    423
  • To page
    432
  • Abstract
    Objectives rpose of this study was to perform a finite element analysis to determine whether adhesive reconstruction is able to restore the original biomechanical behaviour of weakened roots, in terms of fracture resistance, when compared with post/crown-restored teeth with intact roots. s e-dimensional model of a maxillary central incisor was created. The model simulated an endodontically treated tooth restored with a glass-fibre post, a composite-resin core and a metal crown (Model 1). Based on Model 1, a new volume was created in the root cervical third that represented the area where the dentine structure was lost, resulting in a structurally damaged root (Model 2). A 100 N load was applied to the palatal surface at 130° from the long axis of the tooth. After processing (Ansys® 10.0 – Canonsburg, PA, USA), the principal normal stress data were analyzed (S1, tensile; S3, compressive). s dels demonstrated a similar S1 distribution concentrated in the lingual cervical region but different S1 levels (Model 1: 28.7 MPa; Model 2: 35.3 MPa). The S3 distribution indicated differences in behaviour between the models (Model 1: −18 to −27 MPa along the buccal root surface; Model 2: −25 to −32 MPa on the post buccal surface and along the buccal root wall). sions gh the stress distribution within the root walls remained below the ultimate stress limit of the root dentine, the adhesive reconstruction of the weakened roots did not recover the load resistance of structurally intact roots. al significance cision of when to prosthetically rehabilitate weakened roots with cervical dentine structural tissue loss is a challenge for clinicians. A ‘monoblock’ adhesive reconstruction has been proposed for root reinforcement. During treatment planning, the possibility of restoring the mechanical resistance of the root must be evaluated if successful long-term results are to be achieved.
  • Keywords
    Post and core technique , Tooth Fractures , Dental restoration failure , Dental stress analysis , Finite element analysis
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Serial Year
    2012
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Record number

    2129701