Title of article :
Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implant-retained overdenture wearers
Author/Authors :
Preciado، نويسنده , , Arelis and Del Rيo، نويسنده , , Jaime and Suلrez-Garcيa، نويسنده , , Marيa-Jesْs and Montero، نويسنده , , Javier and Lynch، نويسنده , , Christopher D. and Castillo-Oyagüe، نويسنده , , Raquel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
9
From page :
857
To page :
865
Abstract :
Objectives luate the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of implant-retained overdenture users. s ients aged 50–90 years treated with at least one implant overdenture at the Complutense University (Madrid) in 2000–2010 were included. Of those, 42 answered the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) questionnaire. The additive method was used in the OHIP analysis. Data regarding sociodemographic background, overdenture features, and clinical factors were recorded. Sociodemographic and overdenture-related variables for the lost patients (n = 21) were also gathered from their history files. Descriptive probes, Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests, and the Spearman correlation coefficient were applied (p ≤ 0.05). s edominant participants’ profile was that of a 71–80-year-old woman wearing a mandibular overdenture with a bar retention system and a complete denture in the opposite jaw. 71.4% of the respondents suffered from some kind of impact on OHRQoL, showing an average score of 2.7 ± 3.0 (range: 0–13). 100% of respondents reported no impact for the “social disability” and “handicap” dimensions. The most prevalently affected domain was “physical pain”, followed by “functional limitation” and “psychological discomfort”. Variables such as the overdenture location or the retention system affected specific OHIP subscales (p ≤ 0.05). The greatest total score was achieved when the antagonist was a complete denture (p < 0.01). sions t-retained overdentures provide a seemingly acceptable quality of life in the elderly population studied, irrespective of the influence of the location, retention system, and antagonist. al significance gh further research is necessary, mandibular implant overdentures are more comfortable than maxillary ones. Ball-retained prostheses facilitate eating the most, whereas the presence of oral ulcers and/or candidiasis was only detected in the case of bars, thus impairing OHRQoL. A complete denture as antagonist decreases the patient overall satisfaction.
Keywords :
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) , Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) , Patient Satisfaction , Ball attachments , Bar retention system , Implant-retained overdenture
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry
Record number :
2129787
Link To Document :
بازگشت