Title of article :
FORAGING FOR NECTAR AND POLLEN ON THISTLE FLOWERS (CIRSIUM VULGARE) AND ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS: HOW BUMBLE BEES (BOMBUS IMPATIENS) RESPOND TO COLONY REQUIREMENTS
Author/Authors :
PLOWRIGHT، C.M.S. نويسنده , , COHEN-SALMON، DENIS نويسنده , , LANDRY، FRANCE نويسنده , , SIMONDS، VIRGINIA نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages :
-950
From page :
951
To page :
0
Abstract :
We tested two hypotheses proposed to explain why many birds emit distress calls when in the grasp of a predator: the startle-predalor and predator-attraction hypotheses. Responses of captive coyotes to a starling distress call were compared between no-call and call trials to determine whether coyotes are starded by the call, and if so. whether they habituated to it. The coyotes were then paired and re-lesteci to determine whether the call incites a second coyote to approach and interfere with the attack of the initial coyote. Most coyotes exhibited a startle response during their first exposure to the distress call, their tolal startle response and total attack time significantly increased, and number of tugs on the prey significantly decreased in initial response to the call. However, distress calls may only startle naive or inexperienced predators because the coyotes habituated rapidly to the distress call playback. Although coyotes were altracted by the starling distress call. this study provided no evidence indicating that the call caused attracted coyotes to disrupt the attack of the first coyote. Furthermore, when an attracted coyote physically interfered, it frequently induced an intensitied attack on the prey by the first coyote.
Keywords :
bumble bees , pollen , foraging , individual behaviour , choice.
Journal title :
BEHAVIOUR (LEIDEN)
Serial Year :
1999
Journal title :
BEHAVIOUR (LEIDEN)
Record number :
21345
Link To Document :
بازگشت