Author/Authors :
Tardocchi، نويسنده , , M. and Pietropaolo، نويسنده , , A. and Andreani، نويسنده , , C. and Gorini، نويسنده , , G. and Imberti، نويسنده , , S. and Perelli-Cippo، نويسنده , , E. and Senesi، نويسنده , , R. and Rhodes، نويسنده , , N. and Schooneveld، نويسنده , , E.M.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The range of applications of epithermal neutron scattering experiments has been recently extended by the development of the Resonance Detector. In a Resonance Detector, resonant neutron absorption in an analyzer foil results in prompt emission of X- and γ-rays which are detected by a photon counter. Several combinations of analyzer foils and photon detectors have been studied and tested over the years and best results have been obtained with the combination of a natural uranium and (i) Cadmium–Zinc–Telluride (CZT) semiconductor, (ii) Yttrium–Aluminum–Perovskite (YAP) scintillators. Here we compare the performance of the CZT semiconductor and YAP scintillator as Resonance Detector units.
sonance Detector prototypes made of natural uranium foil viewed by CZT and YAP were tested on the VESUVIO spectrometer at the ISIS spallation neutron source. The results show that both YAP and CZT can be used to detect epithermal neutrons in the energy range from 1 up to 66 eV. It was found that the signal-to-background ratio of the measurement can significantly be improved by raising the lower level discrimination threshold on the γ energy to about 600 keV. The advantages/disadvantages of the choice of a Resonance Detector based on YAP or CZT are discussed together with some potential applications.
Keywords :
neutron spectroscopy , Resonance detector , epithermal neutron , CZT , Yap