Title of article
Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions
Author/Authors
Kisgen، نويسنده , , Darren J. and “QJ” Qian، نويسنده , , Jun and Song، نويسنده , , Weihong، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
29
From page
179
To page
207
Abstract
Over the period 1994–2003, 80% of targets and 37% of acquirers obtain a third-party assessment of the fairness of a merger or acquisition. These fairness opinions do not affect deal outcomes when used by targets, but they affect deal outcomes when used by acquirers. The deal premium is lower in transactions if the acquirer obtains a fairness opinion, and is further reduced if multiple advisors provide an opinion. However, the acquirerʹs announcement-period return is 2.3% lower if the acquirer has a fairness opinion, especially if the acquirer pays a high premium, indicating that investors are skeptical of these transactions.
Keywords
merger , conflict of interest , Deal premium , Announcement return , Fairness opinion
Journal title
Journal of Financial Economics
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
Journal of Financial Economics
Record number
2211673
Link To Document