Title of article :
Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions
Author/Authors :
Kisgen، نويسنده , , Darren J. and “QJ” Qian، نويسنده , , Jun and Song، نويسنده , , Weihong، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Over the period 1994–2003, 80% of targets and 37% of acquirers obtain a third-party assessment of the fairness of a merger or acquisition. These fairness opinions do not affect deal outcomes when used by targets, but they affect deal outcomes when used by acquirers. The deal premium is lower in transactions if the acquirer obtains a fairness opinion, and is further reduced if multiple advisors provide an opinion. However, the acquirerʹs announcement-period return is 2.3% lower if the acquirer has a fairness opinion, especially if the acquirer pays a high premium, indicating that investors are skeptical of these transactions.
Keywords :
merger , conflict of interest , Deal premium , Announcement return , Fairness opinion
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics
Journal title :
Journal of Financial Economics